The international team behind the work, which comprised researchers based in Ireland, the United States, Scotland and The Netherlands, mapped the growing and outsized influence that the “Big AI” industry exerts on the capture and control of the narrative, and of the regulatory measures related to AI and its ever-growing use in society.

After taking a deep dive into literature and media reports, the multi-disciplinary team identified 27 established patterns of “corporate capture”, a process by which regulation and public bodies come to act in the interest of corporations rather than people. 

Applying their classification to a dataset of 100 articles, specifically published around four critical events between 2023 and 2025 (the EU AI Act trilogues and the global AI summits in the UK, South Korea and France), they found 249 cases fitting capture patterns. Of these instances, the most prevalent relate to:

• 1) Narrative capture, dominated by narratives such as “regulation stifles innovation” and “red tape” whereby regulation is portrayed as unnecessary, excessive, or obsolete.
• 2) Elusion of law, pertaining to violations and contentious interpretations of antitrust, privacy, copyright and labour laws.

Growing evidence, outlined in the research, suggests that Big AI has undermined and resisted regulation, oversight and enforcement in a variety of ways, such as lobbying; retaliated against whistleblowers, researchers and law-makers; and benefited in some cases from a “revolving door” model where former policymakers go on to advise or take employment with major AI companies. 

There are also many examples of Big AI making significant donations to political parties, public officials owning equity in regulated companies, while some governments and political leaders have also set the stage to undermine existing rules. For example, after previously calling for “simplification”, in October 2025 EU Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen explicitly advocated for deregulation.

Dr Abeba Birhane, director of Trinity’s AI Accountability Lab, based in the ADAPT Research Ireland Centre and Trinity’s School of Computer Science and Statistics, led the new research. 

She said: “In addition to ‘narrative capture’ and the violations and contentious interpretations of antitrust, privacy, copyright and labour laws that were most recurrent, we also found that Big AI frequently uses the notion that ‘regulation stifles innovation’ and that ‘red tape can stymy national interest’ to rationalise their control of the overall narrative.” 

Zeerak Talat, one of the co-authors from the University of Edinburgh, added: “The regulatory and oversight structures and processes that govern the industry deeply impact everything from fostering public trust in systems marketed as AI to the credibility of scientific knowledge, and from educational and healthcare services to information ecosystems, the environment, rule of law and even the integrity of democratic processes.”