Unsuccessful applicants have called for greater transparency and sought access to records concerning their individual applications under the Freedom of Information Act. Some candidates have also requested feedback, while others have sought copies of memos, notes, criteria used for shortlisting, final recommendations, and directions given to civil servants involved in the process.

One candidate said they wanted clarity given the glaring contradictions in experience, geography and criminal law experience in some selections.

A total of 126 candidates applied for seven District Court vacancies, of whom only 20 were shortlisted for interview. The JAC has indicated that candidates will receive only their own application form in return.

Documentation seen by the Irish Independent confirms that the JAC has refused freedom of information requests for further details of how applications were assessed. At least one challenge against the refusal is now under way, with an appeal permitted to the director of the Office of the Judicial Appointments Commission within four weeks of notification. Another unsuccessful candidate is considering a full judicial review.

The Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2023, which came into force last year, created the new independent body to recommend candidates for judicial office. Only those recommended by the commission may be nominated by the Government and confirmed by the president.

The reforms were designed to remove political and personal influence from the appointment process, after critics claimed the old system was tainted by party affiliations, contacts and geographical factors.