England: Tenant immigration checks found in breach of human rights laws

England: Tenant immigration checks found in breach of human rights laws

Legislation making landlords responsible for checking the immigration status of tenants has been found in breach of the UK’s human rights obligations.

Under the ‘Right to Rent’ law, landlords are faced with the prospect of prosecution if they know or have “reasonable cause to believe” that the property they are letting is occupied by someone who does not have the right to rent in the UK. It was introduced by then Homer Secretary Theresa May as part of the UK Government’s attempt to create a ‘hostile environment’ for irregular immigrants.

Delivering his verdict in the High Court in London last week, Mr Justice Spencer ruled that the scheme breached the European Convention on Human Rights on the basis that it led to discrimination against non-UK nationals with the right to rent and British ethnic minorities.

It would be illegal to roll the scheme out in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland without further evaluation, the judge added.

Mr Justice Spencer concluded that discrimination by landlords was taking place “because of the scheme”. He went on to conclude that “the government’s own evaluation failed to consider discrimination on grounds of nationality at all, only on grounds of ethnicity”.

The judge continued by finding that the Right to Rent “does not merely provide the occasion or opportunity for private landlords to discriminate but causes them to do so where otherwise they would not”, describing such discrimination by landlords a being “logical and wholly predictable” when faced with potential sanctions and penalties for getting things wrong.

He concluded: “The safeguards used by the government to avoid discrimination, namely online guidance, telephone advice and codes of conduct and practice, have proved ineffective. In my judgment, in those circumstances, the government cannot wash its hands of responsibility for the discrimination which is taking place by asserting that such discrimination is carried out by landlords acting contrary to the intention of the scheme.”

Share icon
Share this article: